Trusted By
FROM GAME REQUEST TO RECORDED OUTCOME
A Remote Game Server (RGS), also referred to across the industry as a Remote Gaming Server, coordinates game logic, sessions, outcomes, transactions, and communication with the surrounding iGaming ecosystem. Those responsibilities are designed as one connected backend around your games, integration model, operational requirements, and deployment environment.
WHEN A ROUND DOESN’T END CLEANLY
Network loss, timeouts, service interruptions, or downstream failures can interrupt a game before every part of the round has finished processing. The RGS needs enough persistent state to determine what happened and whether that round is active, completed, canceled, or awaiting further action.
Recovery behavior can account for stored game state, retries, duplicate requests, transaction status, reconnection, and reconciliation so an interrupted session does not automatically become an inconsistent one.
The recovery path is planned around the game and its external dependencies. That helps prevent resumed or repeated requests from producing duplicate outcomes, conflicting states, or transaction events that no longer match the underlying round.

ENGINEERED TO STAND UP TO REVIEW
An RGS may need to undergo technical testing, support external certification, and remain auditable as games and software versions change. The underlying records, environments, controls, and configuration points are planned so review requirements do not become a late-stage retrofit.
After The First Game Goes Live
A custom RGS should leave room for new games, integrations, deployment requirements, and technical changes without forcing your portfolio into a fixed server model. Our remote gaming server solution develops for continued evolution so the backend can grow with the products and ecosystems it supports.
Custom RGS development cost is shaped by the architecture, number and type of games, session and transaction requirements, integrations, configuration tooling, infrastructure, testing scope, and whether the engagement involves a new build or an existing server. We review these dependencies before estimating the engineering effort rather than applying one fixed price to substantially different RGS projects.
The development timeline depends on how much of the surrounding ecosystem already exists and what the RGS needs to support. A focused backend module or integration can have a substantially different scope from a new multi-game RGS involving wallet connectivity, platform interfaces, deployment infrastructure, test environments, and certification preparation.
Yes. We can work with an existing Remote Game Server when the priority is to replace specific services, improve scalability, restructure APIs, address transaction or performance issues, add game support, or modernize infrastructure incrementally. The existing architecture and dependencies are reviewed first so changes can be planned without assuming a full rewrite is necessary.
It can, provided the architecture defines clear boundaries between reusable server services and game-specific logic. The implementation can support multiple titles or game categories while keeping mathematics, rules, state behavior, and configuration specific to each game where required.
Yes, where the required technical interfaces and documentation are available. We can build the RGS-side APIs, adapters, authentication, session communication, and transaction flows needed to exchange data with the surrounding ecosystem while preserving clear boundaries between the game server and external systems.
No. Regulatory approval and product certification depend on the target jurisdiction and are handled through the relevant regulatory authority and/or accredited testing or certification body. We can develop the RGS with auditability, documentation, test environments, configuration, and change-control requirements in mind and support the technical work required during external evaluation.
Yes, if extensibility is accounted for in the architecture. Shared services, game interfaces, configuration boundaries, versioning, and deployment workflows can be structured so additional titles are introduced without redesigning the entire RGS for every release.
Useful starting inputs include the games or game types you plan to support, your existing platform and wallet architecture, required integrations, target markets, expected deployment environment, transaction workflows, available API documentation, and any existing RGS or backend components. If some decisions are still open, discovery can identify the technical dependencies before the development scope is finalized.
Tell us where the project stands today. We'll start there.